Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function.

A dosage formula has been derived from a retrospective analysis of carboplatin pharmacokinetics in 18 patients with pretreatment glomerular filtration rates (GFR) in the range of 33 to 136 mL/min. Carboplatin plasma clearance was linearly related to GFR (r = 0.85, P less than .00001) and rearrangements of the equation describing the correlation gave the dosage formula dose (mg) = target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) x (1.2 x GFR + 20). In a prospective clinical and pharmacokinetic study the formula was used to determine the dose required to treat 31 patients (GFR range, 33 to 135 mL/min) with 40 courses of carboplatin. The target AUC was escalated from 3 to 8 mg carboplatin/mL/min. Over this AUC range the formula accurately predicted the observed AUC (observed/predicted ratio 1.24 +/- 0.11, r = 0.886) and using these additional data, the formula was refined. Dose (mg) = target AUC x (GFR + 25) is now the recommended formula. AUC values of 4 to 6 and 6 to 8 mg/mL. min gave rise to manageable hematological toxicity in previously treated and untreated patients, respectively, and hence target AUC values of 5 and 7 mg/mL min are recommended for single-agent carboplatin in these patient groups. Pharmacokinetic modeling demonstrated that the formula was reasonably accurate regardless of whether a one- or two-compartment model most accurately described carboplatin pharmacokinetics, assuming that body size did not influence nonrenal clearance. The validity of this assumption was demonstrated in 13 patients where no correlation between surface area and nonrenal clearance was found (r = .31, P = .30). Therefore, the formula provides a simple and consistent method of determining carboplatin dose in adults. Since the measure of carboplatin exposure in the formula is AUC, and not toxicity, it will not be influenced by previous or concurrent myelosuppressive therapy or supportive measures. The formula is therefore applicable to combination and high-dose studies as well as conventional single-agent therapy, although the target AUC for carboplatin will need to be redefined for combination chemotherapy.

Cisplatin (P), vinblastine (V) and bleomycin (B) combination chemotherapy in recurrent or advanced granulosa(-theca) cell tumours of the ovary. An EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical activity and toxicity of a modified PVB regimen (cisplatin, vinblastine and bleomycin) in patients with advanced or recurrent, pure granulosa cell tumours (GCTs) or mixed granulosa-theca cell tumours (GTCTs). The PVB regimen consisted of cisplatin (P) 20 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) days 1-5, vinblastine (V) 0.15 mg/kg i.v. days 1-2 and bleomycin (B) 30 mg i.v. on day 2, and 15 mg on day 15, for 28 days. 38 eligible patients were entered in this trial. Prior to PVB all patients underwent surgery and 13 received postoperative radio- or other prior chemotherapy. The median number of PVB cycles was 4 in both groups. In the group of 25 patients who had received prior surgery only, 7 and 6 patients had complete and partial responses, respectively (response rate: 52%, 95% confidence limits: 31.3-72.2%). At a median follow-up of 39 months, 6 patients were alive with no evidence of disease, 6 were alive with disease, 12 died due to malignant disease and 1 died due to intercurrent disease. The median time to progression was 13.9 months. The median survival was 25.4 months. 3-year survival was 49% (95% confidence limits: 29-69%). In the group of 13 patients who had previously received postoperative radio- or chemotherapy, 5 complete and 5 partial responses were observed on PVB (response rate: 77%, 95% confidence limit: 46.2-95.0%). At a median follow-up of 50 months, 6 patients were still alive, only 1 without evidence of disease, 6 died due to malignant disease and 1 died due to intercurrent disease. The median time to progression was 19.3 months. The median duration of survival was 41.1 months. Accompanying toxicity was distributed in a similar pattern for both groups. Severe toxicity was mainly documented as haematological toxicity, nausea/vomiting and alopecia. Furthermore cisplatin-related peripheral neurotoxicity and mild/moderate signs of bleomycin-related pulmonary toxicity were observed. The present data confirm the therapeutic activity of the PVB regimen in advanced/recurrent GCTs. The response rate was moderately high compared with previous studies, with a median duration of response of 20 months for both groups.

Randomized trial of dose-intensity with single-agent carboplatin in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. London Gynaecological Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: We have examined the role of an increase in cisplatin dose-intensity in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer by means of single-agent carboplatin therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients were randomized to treatment and eligible for analysis. The dose of carboplatin was calculated according to the Calvert formula. One hundred seventeen patients received carboplatin at an area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 6 for six courses, administered every 28 days, and 110 patients received carboplatin at an AUC of 12 for four courses, administered every 28 days. Patients were eligible provided they had not received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy and had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages II to IV or relapsed stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. RESULTS: The planned total-dose increase was 33% for the patients treated with carboplatin AUC 12, but the received percentage total-dose increase was 20%. There were no differences in progression-free or overall survival between the two treatment arms; the overall survival rate at 5 years was 31% and 34% of patients treated at AUCs 6 and 12, respectively. There was significantly more toxicity associated with carboplatin AUC 12, which resulted in more treatment delays and/or dose reductions (52% v 18%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: We have shown that carboplatin can be delivered at an AUC of 12 for four courses without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, although significant hematologic toxicity occurs. Nonhematologic toxicities were not clinically significant. Carboplatin offers an opportunity to intensify cisplatin therapy, but a greater than two-fold increase in dose-intensity probably needs to be achieved before significant effects on survival will be produced and hematologic support will be required.

Quantitative prognostic features in FIGO I ovarian cancer patients without postoperative treatment.

To identify FIGO I ovarian cancer patients at high risk, prognostic values of quantitative pathological features (volume percentage of epithelium, mitotic activity index, mean (MNA) and standard deviation of nuclear profile area, and volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (MNV) have been investigated in comparison with clinical features, histological grade, and type in 102 adequately staged patients with FIGO Ia, Ib, and Ic ovarian cancer of the common epithelial types. None of these patients received any postoperative treatment. Overall survival of patients alive and well was 78%, and 90% were alive. Of the clinical features, FIGO substage was the strongest prognosticator (Mantel-Cox = 7.2, p = 0.03, hazard ratio (HR) = 4.6). Histologic grade had significant prognostic value as well (Mantel-Cox = 9.7, p = 0.008, HR = 5.9), but histologic type did not. MNA and MNV were the strongest single prognostic factors for overall survival (Mantel-Cox = 12.3 for both; p = 0.0004 and 0. 0005). If MNA 55.6 micron2, 6-year overall survival was 69%. For MNV 460 micron2, 6-year overall survival was 70%. A multivariate combination of MNA and FIGO (early cancer of the ovary prognostic score, ECOPS) had the strongest prognostic value (p < 0.0001 and Mantel-Cox value = 22.8, HR = 29.2). If ECOPS 5.4 (n = 36), 6-year overall survival was 54%. The results from this and earlier studies emphasize the strong prognostic value of easy to assess and highly reproducible morphometric nuclear features in ovarian tumors and offer a useful instrument for the definition of patient groups for future clinical trials.

Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor in adults: are they different from Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor in children?

PURPOSE: To determine whether age at diagnosis influences the behavior of Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical features, treatment, and outcome of 59 consecutive patients with Ewing's sarcoma and PNET treated on the Adult Sarcoma Unit at our institution from 1980 to 1995. RESULTS: The 37 male and 22 female patients had a median age of 24 years. Lower limb was the most common primary tumor site. Fifteen patients had nonmetastatic tumor less than 100-mL volume, 27 had nonmetastatic disease greater than 100-mL volume, and 17 had evidence of metastatic disease at presentation. The origin of the primary tumor was soft tissue in 28 cases, bone in 30, and uncertain in one. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 5-year overall survival (OS) in all patients was 38% and of progression-free survival (PFS), 27%. When patients with metastatic disease at presentation were excluded, these figures increased to 52% and 34%, respectively. Bulk of disease at presentation and response to primary treatment were statistically highly significant predictors of both PFS and OS. Age and tissue of origin of the tumor did not influence outcome. CONCLUSION: The behavior of Ewing's sarcoma and PNET in adults is no different from its behavior in children. We feel the way forward in the treatment of adults with Ewing's sarcoma and PNET is for them to be included in the current multicenter trials of multidisciplinary treatment directed at children.

The use of paediatric chemotherapy protocols at full dose is both a rational and feasible treatment strategy in adults with Ewing's family tumours.

BACKGROUND: Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumour (ES/PNET) are rare, limiting opportunities for therapy studies in adults. Chemotherapy regimens adapted from paediatric studies are often used for adults but concerns about poor outcome and treatment toxicity may adversely affect drug dose intensity. We present our experience using a paediatric protocol at full dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 34 patients with ES/PNET who received the IVAD chemotherapy regimens were reviewed. Received drug dose intensity, toxicity and survival data were collected. RESULTS: Received dose intensity in 30 evaluable patients was 0.92 compared to the standard IVAD schedule. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, 83% of patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. There was no major renal or cardiac toxicity. In patients without metastases at presentation, five-year overall survival was 63% and progression free survival was 39%. Tumour burden at presentation was statistically significantly associated with survival (P = 0.002). The five-year survival rate of 80% in patients presenting with low volume non metastatic disease was equivalent to published paediatric series. CONCLUSIONS: Although the IVAD chemotherapy regimens are myelotoxic in adults, they can be given safely. We recommend that adults with ES/PNET should be included in current multicentre, multidisciplinary treatment studies directed at children.

Natural history and prognosis of untreated stage I epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the independent significance of prognostic factors in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1980 and 1994, all patients with stage I EOC (borderline tumors excluded) following surgical resection were entered onto this study. No patient received adjuvant therapy and patients were monitored as follows: years 1 to 2-physical examination and serum CA125 every 3 months and computed tomographic (CT) scan every 6 months; years 3 to 5-physical examination and serum CA125 every 6 months and CT scan yearly; years 5 to 10-annual physical examination and serum CA125, with CT scan if clinically indicated. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients entered the study. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 15 to 83), and the median follow-up duration 54 months (range, 7 to 157). Five-year survival rates were as follows: stage IA, 93.7%; stage IB, 92%; and stage IC, 84%. Multivariate analysis using Cox's regression identified grade (P < .001), presence of ascites (P = .05), and surface tumor (P < .01) as independent poor prognostic factors. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) substage did not appear to have independent prognostic significance. Intraoperative capsule rupture was not found to be prognostically significant. The impact of pre-operative rupture remains unclear. CONCLUSION: This is an important series, as no patient received adjuvant therapy, and represents the natural history of surgically resected stage I EOC.

Further evaluation of reproducibility and prognostic value of histologic typing and grading in FIGO stage I ovarian cancer patients without systemic locoregional adjuvant treatment.

In order to analyse the reproducibility and prognostic value of histologic typing and different methods of histologic grading, 102 hematoxylin and eosin stained slides of primary FIGO stage I ovarian cancers of the common epithelial types were evaluated. Patients were treated by surgery only. Histologic typing was done using the FIGO criteria and overall total agreement was 61%. Survival was not statistically significant (P-value range: 0.31-0.66). For grading, three different methods were used: (a) the 'intuitive' method; (b) the FIGO method; and (c) the so-called Pathology Research and Practice (PRP) method, which is based on invasion, architecture and nuclear atypia. The best intra- and interobserver results were obtained with the PRP criteria (interobserver agreement rate: 84.3%, varkappa 0.67; intraobserver agreement rate: 87.3%, K 0.76). Univariate survival analyses showed significant differences between grades for all methods and observers. Results of the PRP method were clearly better than for the FIGO method (PRP, Mantel-Cox range 6.70-24.52,P-value range 0.07 - < 0.0001; FIGO, Mantel-Cox range 5.31-6.77,P-value range 0.07-0.034). The 5-year survival per grade showed considerable variation within and between the observers, and was higher with higher grade. We conclude that the assessment of histologic type was reproducible but prognostically not significant in this set of FIGO stage I ovarian cancer patients. The intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the same grading method was fair to good, and showed highly significant results for survival from the PRP method. However, application of different grading methods could result in considerable prognostic variations for the 'same' grades.

Long-term follow-up of the first randomized study of cisplatin versus carboplatin for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase III trial was performed between October 1981 and June 1984 to compare the efficacy of single-agent cisplatin and single-agent carboplatin in previously untreated patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV carcinoma of the ovary following surgery. This report describes the survival rates of patients in this study after a minimum follow-up duration of 8 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients were randomized to receive cisplatin and 67 patients to receive carboplatin. Cisplatin was administered every 4 weeks for a total of 10 courses, courses 1 to 5 at a dosage of 100 mg/m2 and courses 6 to 10 at 30 mg/m2. Carboplatin was administered at a dosage of 400 mg/m2 every 4 weeks for 10 courses. Patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of response after five courses of chemotherapy underwent second-look surgery. The study was designed to allow crossover between the two arms. Thirteen patients were excluded from response analyses because they were incorrectly randomized. Patients were crossed over to the other arm of the study because of progressive disease (PD), nonresponse, or toxicity. RESULTS: The overall response rate for patients randomized to the cisplatin arm was 53.8% (28 of 52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 39% to 68%) and for those randomized to the carboplatin arm, 38.4% (20 of 52; 95% CI, 25% to 53%). There were 16 (30.8%) and 14 (26.9%) complete remissions (CRs) in the cisplatin and carboplatin arms, respectively. None of these differences were statistically significant. The median duration of response for the cisplatin and carboplatin arms was 21 months and 17 months, and the 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 22% and 25%, respectively. The median survival durations for the cisplatin and carboplatin arms were 19.5 and 13 months, and the 5-year survival rates were 15% (95% CI, 8% to 26%) and 19% (95% CI, 11% to 30%), respectively. None of these differences was statistically significant. The median follow-up duration of patients is 9 years. Crossover due to toxicity was more frequent in the cisplatin than the carboplatin arm, occurring in 50% and 3.3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The mature data from this study of patients with advanced ovarian cancer show that cisplatin and carboplatin have similar long-term survival results.

The endodermal sinus tumour and clear cell ovarian cancer.

There are similarities between clear cell epithelial ovarian carcinoma and endodermal sinus tumours. Apart from the morphological and clinical characteristics there are immunohistochemical markers of value in differentiating these 2 tumours and the detection of a raised serum AFP is characteristic of endodermal sinus tumours. These 3 cases we describe show the fallibility of the classical differentiating criteria between these two tumours.

Steroid hormone profile in postmenopausal women with ovarian cancer.

Raised levels of steroid hormones are not expected in postmenopausal women. Therefore, if detected in postmenopausal women with ovarian cancer, they must be assumed to be related to the presence of the tumour and, therefore, may be of use as tumour markers. Serum levels of CA125, progesterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, sex hormone binding globulin and oestradiol were measured in 44 postmenopausal women with ovarian cancer, postsurgery and prior to chemotherapy. The relationship between the four hormone levels, CA125, patient age, stage, residual disease after surgery and differentiation were tested using the Spearman and Kendall rank coefficients. A significant inverse association was found between CA125 and progesterone levels, and CA125 and 17-hydroxyprogesterone. A positive association between 17-hydroxyprogesterone and progesterone was also found, and positive correlations between stage and CA125, and residual disease and CA125 were confirmed.

A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.

In a study designed to compare response rates of patients with stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma to ifosfamide and carboplatin, 152 patients were randomised to receive either sequential therapy with three cycles of ifosfamide followed by three cycles of carboplatin, or to six cycles of single agent carboplatin. Ifosfamide was given every 3 weeks in a dose of 5 gm m-2 as a 24 h infusion with mesna, 1 gm m-2 by i.v. bolus prior to ifosfamide, 3 gm m-2 with ifosfamide, and 1 gm m-2 as an 8 h infusion after ifosfamide. Carboplatin was given in a dose of 400 mg m-2 by short i.v. infusion every 4 weeks. Sixty-eight evaluable patients were randomised to sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin, and 67 to single agent carboplatin. Median follow-up is 36 months (range 5.5-82.3). After three cycles of treatment two patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm achieved complete remission (CR), and 12 partial remission (PR) for an overall response rate of 29%, whereas in the carboplatin arm ten patients achieved CR, and 23 PR, for an overall response rate of 63% (P = 0.0008). Seven of 15 patients with progressive disease, and nine of 20 patients with stable disease at the initial response evaluation, following three cycles of ifosfamide, subsequently responded to carboplatin therapy so that the final response rate to the complete regimen was 65% for the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, compared to 71% for the carboplatin arm (NS). For the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, median recurrence free survival and overall survival were 14.1 months and 18.7 months. Corresponding figures for the carboplatin arm were 14.5 months and 21.5 months (NS). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. However 47% of patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm developed alopecia sufficient to require a wig, compared to only 2% in the carboplatin arm. Ifosfamide is clearly less effective, and more toxic than carboplatin. Ifosfamide failures can however be effectively salvaged by subsequent carboplatin treatment. Ifosfamide cannot be recommended for single agent therapy in ovarian carcinoma, however the combination of carboplatin plus ifosfamide might be a suitable treatment to be tested in a future randomised study against carboplatin alone.

Clear cell epithelial ovarian cancer (mesonephroid): bad prognosis only in early stages.

Clear cell ovarian carcinoma accounts for 4.5% of all cases of ovarian cancer at this center; 43% of patients presented with stage I disease. Stage for stage patients with advanced disease (II-IV) did no worse than other subtypes of epithelial tumors but patients with stage I disease did significantly worse at both 5 (P < 0.05) and 10 years (P < 0.02). Young age (< 60 years), advanced stage, and the presence of vascular invasion are independently poor prognostic factors, while the presence of a predominantly (> 75%) papillary or tubulocystic morphological pattern independently predicts a better prognosis.

Ifosfamide combination regimens for soft-tissue sarcoma.

Two trials using ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma have been completed. In the first study, 50 evaluable patients received ifosfamide (5 g/m2) with mesna (5 g/m2) and doxorubicin (40 or 60 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks. In all, 11 patients (22%) achieved an objective response [3 complete responses (CRs) and 8 partial responses (PRs)]. Toxicities included leukopenia, febrile neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. The overall median survival was 12 months. In the second study, 51 evaluable patients received ifosfamide (3 g/m2) with mesna (3 g/m2), both being given i.v. on day 1, together with etoposide (100 mg/m2) infused i.v. daily for 3 days. Six patients (12%) achieved objective responses (1 CR, 5 PRs). Toxicities included leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. The overall median survival was 7.4 months. Neither of these combination regimens appears to be more effective in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma than single-agent therapy with either ifosfamide or doxorubicin. If the results of chemotherapy in the management of these tumors are to be improved a new approach to therapy is clearly required.

Hypersensitivity reactions to cisplatin and carboplatin--a report on six cases.

Anaphylactic reactions to platinum compounds are well recognised, but uncommon. These vary from true type I reactions to direct histamine release due to nonimmunological mechanisms. We present 6 cases to illustrate this--5 due to cisplatin and a report of this occurring with carboplatin--with a near fatal outcome in 3 of the cases.

Ifosfamide is an active drug for chemotherapy of metastatic cystosarcoma phyllodes.

Metastases from cystosarcoma phyllodes are rare, and treatment generally is ineffective. Four patients were treated with ifosfamide (alone in three and combined with doxorubicin in one). Two patients had complete remissions that lasted 26 and 61+ months. One other patient had a partial response that lasted 13 months. The complete responders were both treated as soon as metastases appeared, when they had only a small volume of disease. This appears to represent a significant improvement on other described regimens for this condition, and further trials of ifosfamide are warranted. Close follow-up of patients at high risk for metastases is suggested.

Relationships between carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in patients with ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: The study was undertaken to define the relationship between tumor response and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) in patients with ovarian cancer; to study the relationship between carboplatin AUC and myelosuppression in the same population; to establish the true impact of carboplatin AUC, prior therapy, and pretreatment platelet and WBC counts on toxicity; and to define an optimal carboplatin exposure for treating patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: With the equation AUC = dose/(glomerular filtration rate [GFR]+25), carboplatin AUC (course 1) was calculated for 1,028 patients (450 previously untreated) who received single-agent carboplatin (40 to 1,000 mg/m2) for advanced ovarian cancer. GFR was measured (chromium-51-edathamil [51Cr-EDTA] or creatinine clearance) in all patients. RESULTS: Regression analysis showed that carboplatin AUC, prior treatment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grade performance status (PS) are predictors of tumor response, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. Pretreatment platelet and WBC counts are additional predictors of thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, respectively. Although the likelihood of tumor response increased with increasing carboplatin AUC, this relationship was nonlinear. In all patient subsets, the likelihood of complete response (CR) or overall response did not increase significantly above a carboplatin AUC of 5 to 7 mg/mL x minutes. At any given carboplatin AUC, thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently than leukopenia, although both approached 100% as carboplatin AUC increased. Both thrombocytopenia and leukopenia were more frequent in pretreated than in untreated patients regardless of pretreatment count. At any carboplatin AUC, the influence of PS on likelihood of response and toxicity was profound. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin dosing by AUC will lead to more predictable toxicity, and increasing carboplatin AUC above 5 to 7 mg/mL x minutes does not improve the likelihood of response but does increase myelotoxicity. Therefore, careful evaluation of high-dose carboplatin therapy in a prospective, randomized trial is needed before such treatment becomes accepted practice.